Skip to content
AI Fluent · Grades 9-12Module 3

Facilitator guide: Algorithmic Bias & Systemic Justice

75 minutesReview status: Being checked

Materials

  • Projector.
  • Devices for the fairness slider once it exists, or two decks of 20 cards per pair (see below).
  • Printed case cards for the Step 2 sort.
  • Four corner signs.

Lesson steps

  1. 1. Same tool, different mistakes (Explainer, 5 min)
  2. 2. Three ways inequity gets in (Explainer, 7 min)
  3. 3. Two kinds of fair (Explainer, 7 min)
  4. 4. The fairness slider (Activity, 8 min)
  5. 5. You are the auditor (Scenario, 6 min)
  6. 6. Quick check (Quick check, 4 min)
  7. 7. Where it touches you (Reflect, 5 min)
  8. 8. Recap (Recap, 3 min)

Note for whoever leads this: this module touches on race, gender, disability, and class. Keep the focus on how systems work, never on individual students, and let anyone pass.

Card decks for Step 4

Use the Step 3 numbers scaled to 20. Group A deck: 20 cards, 10 marked “will reoffend.” Start with 15 in the high-risk pile (9 marked) and 5 in the low-risk pile (1 marked). Group B deck: 20 cards, 6 marked. Start with 5 high (3 marked) and 15 low (3 marked). Both high piles start at 60% marked, and both low piles at 20%. Wrongful flags start at 6 of 10 in Group A and 2 of 14 in Group B. Learners move cards to try to equalize both.

Timing for a 75-minute class

For 60 minutes, do the Step 2 sort as a whole class. For 90 minutes, let groups present their Step 4 choices and defend them.

Minutes What happens Format
0-3 Pre-check Individual
3-10 Step 1: guess the sources of the gap before reading on Whole class
10-22 Step 2 and the sort Pairs
22-34 Step 3: work the numbers on the board, then the Amsterdam case Whole class
34-48 Step 4 Try it with the slider or cards Pairs
48-58 Step 5 audit scenario Groups of four
58-62 Step 6 quick check Individual
62-71 Step 7: ARK’s view, reflect, then the fix-it corners Individual, then whole class
71-75 Step 8 recap and post-check Whole class

Before you start

  • Keep discussion on systems and evidence. Never ask students to share their own experiences of discrimination, and let anyone pass.
  • Some students may have family members affected by criminal justice, health, or housing systems. Present cases calmly and avoid graphic detail.
  • In Step 3, slow down. Draw both groups on the board and count together. The point lands when students see that the math, not anyone’s bad intent, forces the trade-off. Amsterdam then shows it happening to a city that tried to do everything right.
  • ARK’s view is an opinion, labeled as one. Invite students to argue with it. No grade depends on agreeing.

Discussion prompts

Use the deck’s “Ban it or fix it?” debate and “Where’s the real fix?” corners.

Answer notes

Quick check: 1 B, 2 C, 3 A, 4 C, 5 B. Pre/post: 1 B, 2 A, 3 C. If learners choose A on quick check question 5, ask who the average hides.

Words to know

disparate impact
When a rule that looks neutral harms one group more than others.
proxy variable
A data point that stands in for a protected trait, such as a zip code standing in for race.
base rate
How common an outcome is in a group before any prediction is made.
intersectionality
How overlapping identities, such as race and gender together, shape what a person experiences.
algorithmic audit
An independent test of a system for unequal outcomes.

Workshop quick checks

Learners can answer these on their own phones with no account. Answers count toward ARK's anonymous totals.